Monday, February 5, 2018

Clinton's Old Tricks

What and amazing web was weaved by the Clintons and their friends.  Apparently an associate of the Clintons - Cody Shearer, who years ago fabricated a smear campaign against Dan Quayle just prior to Bill's election, may be the actual author of the Steele dossier. There were troubling details in the Steele Dossier that questioned its authorship. Grammatical errors which should never have been made by a man who attended Cambridge and wrote for its publication. That article from American Thinker suggested that parts of this dossier were written by Russian spies who had a good grasp of English but still made odd errors that were typical of someone that grew up outside of England. Now, it has emerged that the same Cody Shearer and who has no intelligence background in Russia but ample background in creating political smears, has written similar allegations about Trump that were mentioned in the Steele dossier. Also, it seems that Shearer's work predates the release of Steele's assertions. This interesting piece of the puzzle explains why the FBI is so reluctant to disclose details regarding the author of the infamous dossier. It will be ever more embarrassing for the FBI to reveal that fabrications in the Steele dossier used to obtain the FISA warrant, were the products of a someone who previously ran a smear campaign against another Clinton opponent.  Investigation of that campaign of lies never gained much ground because Clinton won the election back then.

At this point, my theory of events is as follows: Clintons needed to kneecap Trump and turned to their old friend - Cody Shearer. He then created a bizarre narrative of Trump's sexual encounters with Russian hookers. This information was given to Steele for editing and to make it more credible as it would now be coming from a reputable spy. Steele got paid for attaching himself to this false narrative. This explains why a spy would then leak this information to the media so carelessly. There was a need to show that allegations come from a James Bond type character and not some petty crook with a wild imagination from Arkansas. High ranking members of the FBI worked alongside the Clintons and used these allegations to allow the Clintons to spy on their political opponent during the campaign and later to try and reverse the election results. They did not learn much from all the wiretaps and that may explain Strozk's comment: "There is no there, there".  Now the FBI is desperately trying to suppress all these details. If only Clinton had won like in 1992, none of these would have ever come to light. I am sure many of these actors behave as they do because they still have not fully acknowledged the fact that Clinton lost and their carelessness will not be so easy to cover up this time.

The above was clearly put together and explained much better than I could by Daniel Greenfield. Read it for yourself.

3 comments:

creakypavillion said...

The more comes to light*, the more insecure I feel. If "siloviki" (using the fashionably borrowed Russian tag) from FBI &Co dare to spy on legitimate President and his Administration, what protections have we, the specs in the anthill?

*
https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasdelbeccaro/2018/02/05/biased-fbi-and-doj-officials-broke-the-law-and-tried-to-decide-the-election-an-annotated-timeline/#2bd4f77f3498

http://streetwiseprofessor.com/?p=10809

Anonymous said...

You are absolutely right. If the authorities wish to spy on either of us, we really have no protections despite the bill of rights clearly stating them. I wonder if people still read Animal Farm at school. These rights do not apply to us if the pigs deem it necessary. Some animals are more equal than others. I wonder if the book predicts the ending too.

Rose said...

Barack Obama got elected by unsealing private divorce records. Then voters gave him the keys to the NSA candy store. It's not just Trump, or team Trump he was gathering info on, before this is over we need to know who all was spied on. Which reporters, Congressmen, Senators, Supreme Court Justices (specifically John Roberts). Who is the keeper of the information?

Remember, they never expected Trump to win, spying on him was likely done at the time they were spying on ALL of the opposition candidates. But amped up as he showed signs of being the front runner.

They saw Hillary as a fellow traveler, so she was drawn into the inner circle, and they worked to protect and defend her. She was the natural heir apparent, as corrupt or even more so than Obama and his people.

We not only dodged a bullet when she was defeated, we dodged a full on earth-destroying asteroid.

"It is not that power corrupts but that it is magnetic to the corruptible."